Originally Posted by
robsaw
Well it is AS's position that rules were broken and the other party that they weren't. Stalemate, court-action or sign and move-on. Whether the rest of us believe one, the other or neither is immaterial as no one is giving sworn testimony here.
My interpretation of this thread is that no rules in the official T&C were actually broken, but that AS doesn't like people to use the program (within those rules), but perhaps not as profitably for AS as expected) in a certain way and then as a result forces special rules on them, with the dubious accusation of T&C violations and the threat of account closures.