Originally Posted by
zorn
It's a well-worn conspiracy theory with no merit, because it ignores all the other reasons why planes go from A to B, with the most obvious one being that it has to then go from B to C. Also the crew may need to get there. Throw in maintenance scheduling as well.
Conspiracy theorists are never convinced by anything.
Non-original zero-content well-worn conspiracy theories get the response they deserve.
Of course low-load flights get cancelled all the time as a matter of course, with short frequent hops being obvious candidates. But there is always an underlying cause not related to the flight load.
Aside from the logic flaw (you know,
sometimes planes and crews go back and forth between A and B, they don't always go to C) .... this is some hall-of-fame level vitriol and overall snide miserable-ness here.