FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - BA could have enhanced the F and C experience instead of penalizing WT/WTP.
Old May 4, 2015, 4:34 pm
  #57  
Oaxaca
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA, U2+, SK, AF/KL, IHG, Hilton, others gathering dust...
Posts: 2,552
Originally Posted by HMPS
[/PHP]
Just happen to be shopping for a RT Business class trip. JFK BOM JFK.
Dec 10 to Jan 09 . BA price is $4758. Qatar is $2800
True (and I've made a considerable saving myself booking QR vs BA on flights to Australia), but that's not the comparison being mentioned. JFK-BOM isn't a non-stop on BA. The more relevant comparison is, for example, someone comparing BA WTP fare LHR-BOM with EK J LHR-DXB-BOM. The EK fare may be close in price or even cheaper (and I've no idea how these fares compare, it's a hypothetical example), but it's a connection and a longer travelling time. The OP in this thread made one such comparison, it wasn't clear if they were comparing a direct or indirect J on another airline with BA WTP.

BA will price the WTP at a level they feel they can sell against direct flight competition. This applies much more to UK-based customers (Or perhaps rather London-based) than those based elsewhere, where a connection is anyway required.
Oaxaca is offline