FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Avek00 for TalkBoard
View Single Post
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 7:26 pm
  #16  
ozstamps
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
3M
100 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,351
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:

2. Numerous comments regarding the sorry state of UA's premium cabins (and in particular on the 747-400 aircraft) can be found with a search through FT Archives. </font>
Avek00. You are digging that hole even deeper IMHO.

I have as posted, made 6 long hauls in United C class in recent weeks. And over 100 in recent years.

I think now, and have held the view for some years, that the C cabins of the United 747s are excellent and among the best any airline offers in 747s.

Parroting as FIRST HAND OPINION what you now "think" you have read others have said otherwise does not make that your opinion. It simply makes you a parrot - even IF you get it right. Which IMO you are not. And it is STILL hearsay. You have not by your own admission BEEN in a UA C cabin for 3 years so have no PERSONAL experience on this.

I have never flown Southwest. I would not go into the Southwest Forum and comment on how allegedly crappy their cabins are as I once read someone else post it. In law this is called hearsay and has no weight or credibility at all. (And it would greatly annoy those on the SW forum!)

So, here is my challenge to you, which I think will illustrate nicely most of the above. I will call your bluff, as I firmly believe it is baloney.

You state (again and again) there have been "numerous" comments about the state of the United 747 C class cabins made on these boards.

Can you please post just THREE such links right on this thread to support your assertion?

Can't be difficult? Otherwise I suggest you are 'guilty as charged'.

'Do we need a parrot on the Talkboard' might be some folks thoughts.

--------------------------------------------------------



[This message has been edited by ozstamps (edited 08-07-2003).]
ozstamps is offline