Originally Posted by
bhrubin
The whole exchange here amuses me. Most people commenting herein fly either UA or AA but rarely both with any frequency--so their opinions IMO are nothing more than defensive posturing to feel better about their choices/experiences.
This post attempts to miscategorize people to support the erroneous conclusions asserted without any basis whatsoever in actual fact. There are no bases in fact to support these propositions, just as there is no basis in the continued erroneous assertions that have been made that AA only has 10 77W aircraft when they have nearly double that and that AA does not serve HKG when they started service there over six months ago.
It is patently clear that there is zero knowledge of what AA offers in international F compared to UA.
The content of the post, which is a misguided attempt to defend the $2-billion in cuts UA, should at least be made with legitimate facts and not make believe fallacies.