Nope. The comment he/she made was valid. Multiple issues unrelated to the litigation have been raised. First it was the issue of people not reading the rules of a fare and then it was the application of taxes. While the point on the tango class pax was valid, it had no relatonship to this case. This case relates to deceptive advertising and pricing. Next the issue of taxes, which are not the subject of the litigation is raised. The taxes are not being contested because the law allows the tax to be a separate charge and to not be included in the advertised cost. Comments are all over the map raising issues which have nothing to do with the case. This case deals with an alleged violation of a law which AC and other airlines opposed.