Originally Posted by
joejones
One point in the Mercure's favor is that it is right in the middle of the city of Narita, whereas the Nikko and Radisson are basically in the middle of nowhere.
Ah okay - is there any reason
not to book the Mercure relative to the other two since in this case cheaper doesn't seem to mean significantly crappier or the difference between a solid room and a rundown motel situation. It seems to me like between the three I should just book the cheapest one (which is the Mercure) and that for a quick overnight stay they will all provide a basic, clean non-smoking room, airport shuttle, and some form of access to Narita Town for food (either via shuttle or walking).