FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - What's the point of a run
View Single Post
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 10:40 am
  #66  
suranyi
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 775
First of all, I should point out that I'm not saying there's anything wrong with your point of view. For you, it makes perfect sense. I just want to clarify my position.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Western Airlines:


I must point out that NW flies SFO-EWR and SFO-LEX.

</font>
I know it does. But for my dates of travel it was more expensive than the flights I chose. And I don't mean it was a little more expensive. It was MUCH more expensive. By at least $100 in both cases.

You see, the only reason I decided to take these trips in the first place (aside from the one on WN) was BECAUSE specific airlines were offering limited-time specials on the particular routes. Those limited-time specials are often not matched by other airlines. Had they not had those specials, I would be going on only one of the four trips.

I mean, one can wait until your specific airline offers a special on the route you're interested in. I don't want to have to do that. So I'll fly whatever airline has the special. If no airline has a special, I won't travel at all. That's just the way I have it budgeted.

In the rare case when several airlines are offering the same, affordable, price I will choose UA, because I have almost enough FF miles on that airline to get a free trip to Europe. I've actually gotten two free trips on UA in my life, one domestic and one to Europe, and I think that was quite an achievement!

But even when I travel for work a few times a year I have NO say on the airline that's chosen. The company's policy is: Cheapest possible flight, no exceptions.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">

It appears you are not interested in status or building miles on one carrier through creative use of an alliance, just getting from point A to point B. Maybe if you flew exclusively on WN you would at least get a free ticket now and then.

Happy trails.
</font>
Actually, you're pretty much correct. I'm really NOT interested in status, and I'm not really interested in upgrades either. In both cases, I'll take them if I don't have to pay any more for them, but not if I do. And paying any more includes paying extra to fly a preferred airline.

I'm really only interested in getting free (coach) tickets. I'd rather go in two trips in coach than one in business or first.

I do fly a lot on WN, especially for short distance flights, and I have gotten a few free tickets from them. But WN doesn't fly everywhere I want to go. They don't fly to Europe, say, or Canada (I fly to Montreal once every year). They were actually MORE expensive than UA to EWR (with WN I would have to fly to ISP), and also more expensive than ATA to LEX (with WN I would have to fly to SDF).

The bottom line is that for me, I will almost always choose the cheapest airline for my trip, even if it means I spread my travel around many different airlines. Status benefits, and even future free trips, seem very abstract to me, while cold hard cash I can feel in my hands. I mean, if I fly three times on three different airlines, but I save $100 each time, then that's the same as if I'd earned a free $300 trip on one airline.

IF the difference in price is less than, say, $20, I might pay more to get a preferred airline. But that's my absolute limit.

But that's just me, and my philosophy. I perfectly well understand that others feel differently.

Ed

suranyi is offline