Originally Posted by
petaluma1
In the comments section of the linked article, there is one person who insists that the "victim" (my term) lied to the TSA when asked about organic matter because he, the vic, should have known it was organic. This commenter is also insisting that the passenger is unintelligent because he doesn't know what organic matter is.
His 'comment' reads like a very big steaming pile of something 'organic'.
Interesting that the commenter doesn't seem to have a problem with a supervisor either lying - even under oath- because he should have known the interaction was on tape or stupid because he didn't realize someone might look at the tape.
Sadly, all too often, this has probably worked just fine for this supervisor - just as it 'worked' this time. He's still on the job, getting paid big $ and retirement and medical benefits. It's the victim of his abuse who was arrested and inconvenienced, not the lying supervisor.