Originally Posted by
EricH
If this is "news" why is the article illustrated with a still from a movie from 35 years ago?
It's not "news" but an essay/column (as are most articles on
Salon), and since the essay talks about how the architectural aspirations of decades old airports raise our views/aspirations of flying, it doesn't seem altogether inappropriate to start the article with a picture from the "golden age of flying."
Did you even read the article?