That there were only 12 votes says something, however the 10 million number isn't really relevant since [a] there are probably a lot of members whose accounts are inactive ( how many people actually close QF accounts ) and [b] not all 10 million are FT members
It seems risible to me that with 6 votes out of 12 cast that it would even be carried forward to an overall voting; for any meaning at all, surely there should have to be a minimum number of votes cast imo
Then again, since the options were foist upon the voters by someone who admits that they do not have a full understanding of the benefits of the scheme probably doesn't help either