I understand that some people are certain the feature will have no value. What I have trouble understanding is some people also are so sure of their assessment that they oppose a trial to gather more information, information which could surprise all of us.
I find this persuasive. In fact, I think this (the trial) approach could be used even more often on FT.
I am against the button based on personal use of FT and experience of sites that has the button. But for me there is no logic in opposing the trial. I'm sure there are good arguments on where and how to conduct a trial, but I will not argument against a trial as such.
I'd like to ask something completely different. What need is meant to be satisfied with this function? I mean beyond making it easier for expressing "like".
I am asking to find out how far this idea goes. Is there any thoughts beyond the apparent change of the forum by adding this button? When you have gathered the likes of the community, what are your thoughts on how to use that data?
Is the result supposed to merely be subtle guide to certain posts?
Is the result meant to be used in another way? Sort comments by popularity, make top-lists of "most liked posts", diploma of "most liked poster of the year"? Or is it just intended as a instant gratification system to posters?
I mean no distrust in the idea makers, it is just that IRL I've seen too many ideas funded and launched without a clear plan for what they are supposed to do in the long run.