Originally Posted by
3TEN
I have submit an official enquiry to CAAS, who is incharge of SIN ATC, and they responded "BR225 was informed of gate D34 upon landing by air traffic control but the pilot had mistakenly taxied towards gate D32 instead". I have no reason to doubt their official response. On the other hand, EVA has so far refused to provide written response to my feedback. Instead, they got their local SIN staff to call me and tried to pretend to close the case.
Something you need to learn about human nature is that if an ambarrassing situation can be blamed on someone else, it will be. You'll never know who is right here because 1) It is an incredibly minor thing and no one is going to waste time reviewing the ATC tapes to check on it and 2) the transmission might have have been slightly garbled as it came over the radio. Frankly, I don't see why you've got your panties in such a twist about it.
Safe travels,
Doc