Originally Posted by
3TEN
I have submit an official enquiry to CAAS, who is incharge of SIN ATC, and they responded "BR225 was informed of gate D34 upon landing by air traffic control but the pilot had mistakenly taxied towards gate D32 instead". I have no reason to doubt their official response. On the other hand, EVA has so far refused to provide written response to my feedback. Instead, they got their local SIN staff to call me and tried to pretend to close the case.
and what would you do if Eva replied saying there was a miscommunication on SIN ATCs part? Would you shy away from flying out of SIN and take your business to KUL or wherever? Whole line of thinking seems silly and far out of proportion to the perceived issue.
Anyway EVA is generally considered one of the safest carriers and I would not let some completely inconsequential gate mix up effect any ticket buying decisions one way or another.