Suing this site is laughable in the first place - claiming a public safety concern is gibberish nonsense some overpaid corporate lawyer pulled out of their rear end.

It's on the airlines to detect this behavior and carry out a contractually supported action against the infringer - in the case of a MP member, they could lose their account, however if the person is not a MP member there is little the airline can do except block that person from traveling if they do it too many times.

Only an idiot judge, or one who is "owned" by corporate interests would allow this suit out of the starting gate if it gets to trial.