This response is laughable.

People are certainly willing to pay for convenience, thus the value in your application.

The problem, however, appears to be that the data that it provides may be obtained in violation of the ToS of various third party websites. But, the problems don't stop there. If what I read here is factually correct, you have also encouraged, directed, and assisted your customers to obtain access to yet another third party site in an illegal, or, at the very least, highly unethical way.

While doing all of this, you are attempting to hide. You don't provide any information on the name or address of your business. Further, the website is registered to a postal box on a tiny, very remote, island. You are likely doing this to make it as difficult as possible for legitimate businesses, the businesses whose ToS you violate, to serve you with a cease and desist (when they do want to find you, to serve you with a lawsuit, they will). Or perhaps you are, like any hacker, actually operating from some essentially lawless land?

The problem is, cowering in the shadows cuts both ways: you can't both hide and enforce your "user agreement." Under what jurisdiction's laws are the terms of this agreement construed?

If what I have read here is correct: that you have directed others to access a third party site in an unethical or illegal manner, that your application accesses, or uses methods or means, in violation of third party ToS, or that you fail to provide a business name and address, it is amazing to me that FT allows you to continue posting and marketing your product here. That, honestly, says as much about FT as it does you.