Originally Posted by
Moderator2
There have been a lot of less than elegant comments made over the last ten days, and many of them were just not focused on the thread topic. If people want to debate esoteric legal theory, let's try Omni.
I went back through about the last 300 postings, and felt the need to redact only about 8% of them. In a few cases posts referring to a now deleted one may seem slightly disjointed, but my goal was to remove only statements that just plain did not meet board rules of conduct.
There are at least five moderators that look in on this thread. Rather than playing vigilante cop, if you have a problem with a post, use the "Report" button. I can assure you the notice gets read, and action will be taken if judged appropriate for the board and thread.
Moderator action has removed the references to the fraudulent use of the academic institutions login credentials - thanks for that.
Has there been any moderator action to the FT Company Representative that provided these instructions in the first place?
There have been several specific requests for transparency to ensure other T&C of the sites is not being violating with the scraping.. Is this not a reasonable and appropriate request to require specific answers, especially given the FT Company Representative status?