FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - City pairs that make little sense to fly
View Single Post
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 10:28 pm
  #36  
darthbimmer
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,377
Originally Posted by dchristiva
And, frankly, while I wouldn't necessarily fly a route that should only take 3-4 hours to drive, sometimes the cost and the time spent not behind the wheel can be worthwhile.
I agree. I use two different time thresholds for driving versus flying:

1. I will drive the entire route instead of flying if I can drive door-to-door in 4 hours. This is because the process of transiting to the airport, clearing security, waiting, flying, and transiting on the other takes about 4 hours even if the flight is only 45 minutes.

2. I will skip taking a short-hop connection if I can drive it in 2 hours. This is less than the 4 hour threshold above because I still have to spend (or have already spent) time on clearing security and transit to/from the airport on the other end. Basically I figure that once I'm already at the airport, taking even a short connecting flight generally adds at least 2 hours to the itinerary.
darthbimmer is offline