FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - AA 'Evaluating' Long Range A321Neo
View Single Post
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 4:49 pm
  #58  
eponymous_coward
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,239
Originally Posted by Fanjet
And how many markets in Asia, Africa, and Europe are there that EK/QR/EY would like to fly to from their bases, where a 333 or 777 is too much capacity?
As mentioned, QR/EY fly A320s to a lot of places (near Middle East, Africa, India). So what markets need excess range in DXB/AUH/DOH? Not many. Much of the excess range the A321neoLR would give them would put the plane in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean (not a lot of markets there, hmm?), and with the way DXB works as a scissors hub, it makes perfect sense for EK to use A380s to HAM, MXP, MAN and so on.

The ME3 don't do long/thin. Again, superhub. They can connect people Australia/SEA Asia/India-XXX-Europe/South America/North America. USA carriers, not so much, so a long/thin plane that goes TATL makes some sense. Believe me, if there was interest outside some niche markets, Boeing would never have cancelled the 757, they'd be building it for the ME3.
eponymous_coward is offline