FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - AA 'Evaluating' Long Range A321Neo
View Single Post
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 11:11 am
  #54  
eponymous_coward
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,244
Originally Posted by cmd320
EK does not by QR and EY both use A320 series aircraft on medium length routes to Europe and South Asia.
Yes, QR and EY use A320 shorthaul configured planes, but there's no need to go to a stretch A321neoLR for a lot of those routes the same way you need to for a US-EU TATL route. Most of what EY/QR do with those A320s is India or North Africa/near Middle East, well within range of an A320.

The market for long, thin routes (or the hot and high things a 757 does well because of all that excess engine) isn't great. If it was Boeing wouldn't have shut down the 757 line. That's why I think anything that shows up will be a stretch/re-engine/optimization of an existing plane, rather than a brand new line with commensurate very high engineering cost and break-even point for selling. Witness how the 748 has gone; lovely plane, LH is already talking about dumping them. The A380 would be a white elephant were it not for the European carriers and EK propping it up. Planes are not a "build it and they will come" proposition.
eponymous_coward is offline