FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Would you fly Russian Concorde or no Concorde at all...?
Old May 13, 2003 | 6:18 pm
  #6  
mikey1003
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: He who dies with the most miles wins!!
Programs: WorldPerks Demoted again to SE, DL 3.1MM Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 11,678
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by SEA_Tigger:
The TU-144 never recovered from the crash of one of the Mk. II prototypes (with new wings and "split" engine bays) at the 1973 Paris Air Show (as she tried to miss a French fighter on a reconnaissance-gathering mission).

The plane did do a scheduled mail-run between Moscow and Alma Ata, Kazakhstan, but one passanger plane crashed in 1977 and she was pulled from service a year later.

As WHBM noted, her operating costs were obscene asher Kuznetsov NK-144 turbojets needed afterburner to maintain Mach 2+ flight, which limited range to 4000 miles. And as a Concorde reminds me of a CRJ inside, the TU-144 is more like a Jetstream 41. *shudder*

Still, was a kick to see her at the Moscow Monino museum.

A decent site: http://www.bird.ch/Russians/Tu144/TU144P01.html
</font>
Do the Russians make any plane where the wings don't droop???
mikey1003 is offline