Originally Posted by
hazelrah
Certainly, but mergers are complex and each one is unique and presents a set of unique challenges. Southwest had a bad year last year with on-time metrics, there is no denying that.
Unfortunately, WN's problems have spilled into 2014. Frankly, I'm not sure their problems are as much about the merger as they are about having deviated from the things that helped them look good in the past (I use the term "look good" because I'm not convinced that they were better because they were better or because they ran a network that had fewer risks of problems) - flying in good weather states, emphasis on point-to-point, more limited exposure to "problem" airports, single aircraft type, etc. As they discovered, however, there was probably a limit to how far they could expand their previous model, which is why they changed, and I'm not sure that WN has figured out how to run this different model. The worst case scenario would be that they never do figure it out.
Originally Posted by
hazelrah
I already have. I have already stated previously that so far the Delta merger has been the best managed of the lot.
Fair enough. For some reason, I tended to recall your statements not necessarily including WN in the comparator group.