Originally Posted by
Globaliser
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil-man
Apparently if you track it on Flightradar it did. If it was related to smoke or a fire, I'd want the pilot to get the plane down to a sensible height ASAP.
I agree. But not like a Stuka. And not at a rate which might tear the aircraft apart - that cure would be worse than the disease.
If you look at the numbers on Flightaware, you will see that the aircraft left 41,000 feet at about 1050 "BST" (I'm never fully confident of Flightaware's time zones). It reached 7,000 feet at about 1105, 15 minutes later. That's 34,000 feet in 15 minutes or about 2,200 fpm on average - which is much more plausible. During the descent, the highest vertical speed figure given by Flightaware is 3,900 fpm, and >3,000 fpm was only sustained for about 5 minutes.
Now, in the light of the hysterical numbers you were given, how reliable is the rest of your source's information? Is it even confirmed that there was a fire on board, as opposed to merely smoke (from some other reports)?
I'm just quoting what my colleagues husband who works is BA is telling me, and the primary source is a BA friend who was on the flight.
Is it true? I don't know, but I've relayed it in good faith, and have no particular reason to doubt it. If you have a problem, don't bother reading it.