Originally Posted by
joshwex90
I'm someone who loves complaining! But I HATE complaining for the sake of complaining. UA GF FAs have been incredible on every flight. Only consistency I've ever had. And the seat (I believe they're now all the new one) is fantastic. It's no suite, and obviously I'd take SQ or EK if I had the chance. But what more can I want than an intimate cabin, a seat wider and longer than I need it, comfy, all the storage I need, nice IFE screen, no one climbing over me and no one for me to climb over, etc.
Wow, where have you been when all of this time as the FTers have been bashing me for my like of UA GF?
I so agree. I don't deny that F in SQ and CX (and EK I'm sure, as I'll be flying that in Jan) are better overall, especially on food/service, but the GF on UA has been more than satisfactory for me when I've flown it (about half the time I fly F). I've found UA GF to have pretty good service, pretty fun FAs, pretty decent food, and excellent IFE. The seat is nice--not as good as SQ or CX, but about as good as TX (non suite) and BA (non A380).