FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Tight connections and airline vs passenger responsibility
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 8:27 am
  #8  
jrl767
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
Community Builder
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA — the REAL Washington; occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: AS MVPG 100K (Atmos Titanium) / 0.5MM; DL fallen PM (1.58MM = “Complimentary Annual GM”); AA Gold
Posts: 24,366
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Sometimes passengers who travel a lot know what connecting times are reasonable in particular circumstances, including consideration of the likelihood that the first flight will be delayed due to seasonal weather problems, etc. Someone on the DL forum has recently suggested the concept of Sensible Connection Time, abbreviated SCT. Airlines and travel agents ... shouldn't offer itineraries that violate reasonable SCTs but passengers also shouldn't blindly accept them. ...

... there's a shared responsibility that begins long before the airport.

A further aspect is that anyone with mobility problems or who is traveling with a family should obviously allow more time while those who can walk fast and know the airport might do well with risky connections.
absolutely no argument here

not everyone is as travel-savvy as most of the FT community, and not everyone wants (or knows) to take a little extra time before booking -- and again before actually traveling -- to think through a couple scenarios and recovery plans for when a simple (or at least a well-choreographed) trip might go elliptical
jrl767 is offline