Originally Posted by
alexmt
Worldwide, Amex doesn't face the same regulation because they aren't considered to have undue influence on the market. If a merchant doesn't take Amex, it's not going to cost them much, if any, business. If a merchant doesn't take Visa or Mastercard, that will hurt their business. Thus, they face stricter regulation.
You may claim there is no grounds for a lawsuit, but Australia's consumer protection (or in this case, merchant protection) group has ALREADY sued Visa over not allowing Dynamic Currency Conversion -
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-releas...ainst-visa-inc
THIS is why Visa and Mastercard allow the practice, they're heavily regulated in most of the world. Discover/Diner's and Amex are not since they're not seen to be able to control the market in the same way. This is also why Visa/MC interchange is heavily regulated and Amex isn't.
If Visa hadn't invented DCC in the first place, there would be no basis for any lawsuits.
What do you think the original rationale for DCC was? Customer convenience? Or, to make Visa/MC more attractive to merchants?