Originally Posted by
qwertyasdfghzxcvbn
You weren't asking for consistent use. You asked what the word destination meant in relation to the 15 destination from DAL comment.
When GK was talking about 50 new destinations, he was talking about the WN network ("compared to 96 today"). In order to add a new destination to the WN network, it must be a new dot.
When GK was talking about adding 15 new destinations from DAL in Oct./Nov., he was talking about DAL. These could be either new dots or new lines, but as WN had already announced the 15 new Oct./Nov. DAL destinations, it is clear what "destinations from DAL" is defined as. Lines on a map.
I have no idea what you're trying to accomplish here other than to try to be insufferable. I *am* asking for a consistent use of the term by asking just what WN's definition that word is. It seems to have two meanings: one meaning being new dots and the other new, non-stop service from DAL.
You can assume all you want what GK was talking about - you may be correct. But a new destination to me and just about everyone else is an actual new dot/city - not a line on a map representing a non-stop city pair. If you're fine with WN or GK using the same term to imply two different things, that's your prerogative. I'm not. So be it.