Originally Posted by
Wiirachay
I've read some stories here about poor treatment by US Customs. I've only received poor treatment once, at the US-Canadian border back in the early 2000s. Other than that, all other instances were fine at both land borders and at airports.
But here's a scenario that I've thought of and wondered what could come of it?
Situation: Poor treatment of traveler, but with US Customs fully clearing traveler to legally enter the USA, perhaps with traveler in tears or items spread all around like a mess, with US Customs on a power trip, with no sense of empathy or professionalism, to help traveler get re-organized. (e.g. calling an assistant to help re-organize and repack. Yes, I've seen assistants of US Customs help travelers re-pack and re-organize.)
Traveler then asks US Customs officer to verify that they're fully cleared into the country in a monotone voice. Customs officer responds, "yes," with a bunch of other US Customs staff in the area.
Scenario A: Traveler says in a monotone, non-threatening voice, "Give me your name, badge # now."
Does customs officer retain any right to demand a follow-up inspection?
Scenario B: Traveler says in a monotone, non-threatening voice, some kind of intelligent insult, such as, "I see you think that your unprofessional and poor treatment of travelers compensates for low person self-worth."
Does customs officer retain any right to demand a follow-up inspection?
Yes, I know the majority of US Customs people are fine, do their jobs professionally, and treat travelers with dignity. But there are some bad apples out there, whom I think need to be put in their place through either being reported or being told in a subtle, monotone manner that they're essentially a sack of manure.
I was a graduate student at the time I received poor treatment at the US-Canadian border back in the early 2000s, when actually leaving the USA (MI side) to transit Canada and re-enter the USA (NY side). Somehow, I was just flagged for exit inspection that went beyond cursory and extended into un-professionalism. Upon re-entry to the US a few hours later, the experience with US Customs was cursory with typical professional behavior.
Since all my previous encounters prior were routine, (e.g. x-ray, direct exit, physical bag inspection with professional manners) I was just too dumbfounded to make any comments at the poor treatment I received, and too dumbfounded to even pause and ask for a badge number to report.
Your scenario B will have no effect at all. It doesn't matter if you think is non-threating or monotone (which matters little at all). Your scenario A is a little better. You will have better results if you leave the
now off the end of your request. The officer will give you his name. While customs officer's do have badge numbers, they are not used in the manner you believe they are (they are not identified by them).
If you are not happy with the way the interaction was handled, you should ask to speak with a supervisor. The supervisor will be happy to discuss the situation with you. Please keep in mind that in many small land border ports this conversation may take place on a phone. This is because the supervisor may be located at a different Port of Entry which may be a half hour to an hour drive away. In an airport, it is likely that the supervisor would be present.
It is worth mentioning that personnel matters in the US Customs and Border Protection Service are no different than any other public or private business. They are confidential. If the supervisor determines that any behavior warrants the employee "being put in their place" the traveler is not going to be aware of that outcome. It is not that travelers job to "put the employee" in their place. An attempt to do that many times will not have the desired outcome. Be mindful that most law abiding travelers (rightly so I might add) are not aware of what tactics smugglers of contraband and criminals use. One of those commonly used is to be indignant, threaten complaints, and to be passive aggressive. This is an attempt to dissuade the officer from continuing the inspection for fear of the officer getting in trouble. For this reason, it is better to get a supervisor involved and not try to put the officer in his place.
As for the repacking issue , there is a operational reason that often officers will not repack luggage.
FB