FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - passport Control Regime at KLIA
View Single Post
Old Mar 10, 2014 | 2:22 pm
  #6  
Passmethesickbag
1M50 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NCL
Programs: UA 1MM/*G. DL Gold for one more year.
Posts: 5,356
Originally Posted by FredAnderssen
First off, someone's identity has little to do with whether an airplane is safe to fly in or not. As is often pointed out here, one can travel through Europe with no identification whatsoever, and planes aren't falling out of the sky! Someone traveling on a stolen passport doesn't automatically make them a terrorist. I can think of dozens of reasons to travel anonymously that don't include the will to blow up an airplane.

Second, I've never traveled through asia and have little knowledge as to the extent of their security control, but assuming that they have at least as good security as one finds in Europe or the U.S., one can assume that small tubes of toothpaste, water bottles, knives, guns, and BOMBS aren't being carried onboard, notwithstanding this airline allowing some to board on stolen passports. There is little to no chance, given (I assume again here) that the cockpit doors are reinforced that these mysterious travelers can make a successful assault on the cockpit.

So, even if these mysterious travelers were terrorists with nefarious intent, all the other protections in place from the moment they entered the airport would make any attempts to attack the plane useless.

Third, the entire idea of terrorism is to strike fear into the traveling public. This is done by taking credit for the evil act itself. There has been no one claiming that they've downed an airplane as far as I know. That would be very unusual for a group that was bent on terrorism.
You make some very good points. However, it is odd that MH did not cross-check their passenger list against Interpol's database, and not just for security reasons. One presumes that if a pax is refused entry at their destination because they're travelling on an easily verifyable fake passport, then the carrier would be liable to pay for their removal from the country. Then again, these people would have had to have visas to enter China, and it is equally mystifying to me that the Chinese authorities don't cross-check against Interpol's database either. Surely this must be eminently possible to do in real time.

If these people were travelling on fake passports for less nefarious reasons, then it is very sad to think that their loved ones may never find out what happened to them.
Passmethesickbag is offline