FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - B&R U116 vs. Crew 9 Rolling Tote
View Single Post
Old Jan 30, 2014 | 4:45 am
  #5  
bill12
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 137
Originally Posted by thegasguru
Externally the Crew 9 seems infinitesimally larger to me than does the U116. I know they both fit just right with no extra margin into the overhead bin of a CRJ200 or an ERJ145. Sorry, I haven't had to delight of flying on a Dash8, but I imagine it's a similar type storage situation. The interior packing area of the U166 and the Crew9 are about the same, with the interior of the Crew 9 being maybe a tiny bit larger - if at all. However, I find that packing the U116 feels a lot easier, since it zips open to allow top and/or front loading, whereas the Crew 9 only allows front loading. That may simply be up to individual preference, but top loading feels easier to me. Being able to get something OUT of the bag while in transit - like an electronic gadget - is CERTAINLY easier from the top (like the U116), rather than from the front (like the Crew 9).

Hope that helps.
Thanks, that does help. I had assumed the U116 to be larger from looking at pictures. I agree with you about top loading.
bill12 is offline