Originally Posted by
oc2005
fishy21's post sounded like a very clear argument/line of reasoning to me. Like I said, this issue seems a lot more black & white when you don't have a horse in the race.
Your implication is not appreciated. None of my arguments have been tainted by "having a horse in the race." I've been making logical arguments from the beginning. The issue grows tiresome to reiterate.
For anyone reading the thread, you've got the facts. This was certainly an interesting case.