Originally Posted by
burmans
Seriously, you cant be bothered to actually go and read the article and then click on the site used where it lays out the criteria.
A great bunch of critics but where is your list and your methodology we can compare against and criticise. At least this site has a formal set of criteria.
Your assumption is incorrect. Surely you would have realised I read the news.com article (OP's link). A quality newspaper would have provided more than just the glorified result. And doesn't it seem odd that QF are a sponsor of the airlineratings.com website?