FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Is Intercontinental really a luxury hotel brand?
Old Dec 11, 2013 | 5:22 pm
  #13  
Land-of-Miles
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MAN and LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC LT Gold, HH Dia, MR LT Plat, IHG Diamond Amb, Amex Plat
Posts: 13,922
I think you can call out examples of MO, SR, 4S and Waldorf Astoria properties which are far from luxurious. To me IC seems on a par with Starwoods SR and/or Luxury Collection chains, with WA, 4S and similar to with Starwood for Marriott some sort if hybrid of JW and RC.

I think the individual IC's are far more variable than perhaps their near cousins in other chains which makes direct comparison somewhat variable. Looking at the IC London Park Lane I would happily put it on a par with almost all other Mayfair luxury hotels. The IC Westminster in the same city Is less luxurious and could equally be a JW Marriott or Conrad.

IC does however tend to offer more relevant luxury to my needs with more emphasis on discreet attentive service and less on pointless "butler" services.
Land-of-Miles is offline