FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Would you rather... (2 Routes to Phuket)
View Single Post
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 11:50 pm
  #9  
nkedel
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Originally Posted by BrianG86
Option 1: Fly AA all the way to NRT, then japan airlines to bkk, then dragon to HKT.
What aircraft is the NRT-BKK leg? The NRT-BKK leg is 7 hours, and if it's the JL 763, those things are MISERABLE... make the AA 767s look nice, the seats have super-wide armrests so unless you have a narrow tush, they are very tight, and the pitch is tight as well (SeatGuru lists 34" pitch, which isn't awful, but does not match my experience.)

(I'd also consider using AirAsia or Tiger for Bangkok (DMK, the old airport, probably) to HKT, and only ticketing as far as BKK on the major.)

What about saving money and doing AA coach? 31ABHJ are really, really good seats if you can snag one on one of the days you're going.

Option 2: Fly AA from BWI to LAX, then Cathay on a 777 in coach to HKG and another cathay in coach to HKT.
What about paid Premium Economy on CX? Likely cheaper than 1, pricier than 2, and intermediate in comfort, but fewer connections than 1 and miuch nicer on the short-haul leg. If the fares are good, of course -- if not it might be pricier than 1, and not worth considering.

What would you do? How are the Cathay 777's that do LAX-HKG in coach?
All on the new seats, AFAICT, and a fairly comfortable 3-3-3. Status WILL get you into the extended legroom (bulkhead/exit) seats for free, although as of my last CX flight you will need to phone to get those seats.

Will my status get me into premium economy or am I out of luck?
Only if regular coach fills up; I've gotten more op-ups on CX than I have on AA, and I'm a mere PLT, but it's pretty rare.

Originally Posted by Gamecock
I can't imagine flying TRANSPAC in coach. But I am a wimp.
Originally Posted by Unterwegs
I would not fly transpac in Eco, even on a relatively good airline like CX.
Originally Posted by Paiteaw
Given the choices presented, I would not be opting for one involving a coach flight across the Pacific. I've done it many times but now have no desire experience it again.
Wimps. I've done it at least once and usually 2-4x a year most years for the past ten years, and it's not that bad. Honestly, the awfulness of the long-arse 767 leg from NRT kills a lot of the goodness of business class on the leg to Tokyo.

Originally Posted by im.daniel
I'd personally take the hit in Y and use the saved money on another trip/at the destination. 12 hours isn't that bad
Ditto.
nkedel is offline