Originally Posted by
sophiagymgall
Yes, that was ET 961, which crashed while attempting a water landing near the Comoros Islands - it ran out of fuel after being hijacked. People who hadn't inflated their life jackets were able to swim out of the aircraft and then swim to the coast, which was fairly close.
Basically, you have no way of knowing what will be safer should there be a major issue. In some particular cases, depending on the nature of the issue, it's better to inflate your life jacket, and in some cases it isn't. It's akin to deciding to sit in the front or the back of the aircraft - while there are some statistics about it, obviously you have no guarantee that if you sit in the back you won't get unlucky and have it be the most damaged area of the aircraft, as was the case with ET 961, IIRC. Basically, all you can do is take your pick and hope you chose right for that particular flight!
I didn't know about that one. Makes sense in that sort of situation - guess you have to judge the situation you are in. I'm hoping that, if I were to remain conscious, I could tread water and remain calm long enough to inflate my life vest manually - I guess, in fact, in some circumstances it may be be easier to swim away from the aircraft without the drag of one of the 'one size fits all' life vests - and I would want well away from any floating fuel!