Originally Posted by
GUWonder
Since when is a statement of fact to be called an assumption? When the claim that a statement of fact is an unsupported assumption is being made by those unaware or unwilling to admit the facts.
Good luck attempting to disprove anything stated in my posts above.
Better luck trying to prove them. I guess this is your admission that you have no source. It really didn't have to be that difficult.
There's a big difference between claiming something is true with no facts, than claiming something can't be proven with no facts.
Originally Posted by
GUWonder
Chinese manufacturers, by the way, have been sued in the US before and it doesn't take much luck to do so.
And a quick google search shows that those judgements are almost always meaningless.
From Reuters: "To date I am not aware of a single case where a United States judgment has been enforced in China," said Owen Nee, a Jones Day lawyer who has been practicing in China for more than 30 years.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...29211020110214
Originally Posted by
GUWonder
You'll need more luck to sue and win in the US against a US company that is helping the US spy on US persons
I suspect the consumer is un"luck"y in either case. We can argue about whom is *less* "luck"y, but it's getting rather silly.