Originally Posted by
FWAAA
Despite the revisionist history being spouted by AA management and its general counsel ("there is no Plan B"), the merger with US was clearly Plan B.
Technically, the lawyers are right - there is no Plan B - at least as it's usually thought of. Plan A was the original standalone plan, with B being the merger. Plan C would be something other than Plans A or B. If they go back to the original plan, it's not Plan B, it's Plan A. If they end up doing something else, then it would be going to Plan C.
So for all intents and purposes, they are absolutely correct when they said there was no Plan B.
Is your head ready to explode yet?