Originally Posted by
Eric Westby
It won't be the same process, because it won't involve CBP, but simply TSA. It will by necessity be less intrusive, because they won't have to take into account the possibility that you might sneak something through customs, but simply whether you're a threat to safety. That's a much smaller percentage of people.
As a concrete example, my partner and I were quickly approved for Clear but both denied Global Entry. Still can't figure out why, as neither of us has ever had the slightest run-in with the law or CBP, but that's covered in another thread. I fly maybe 20 times a year, but I loathe security lines and will gladly pony up the $85.
The report states it will resemble the GE process. Not my words, USA Today and Pistole. The TSA is a wholly owned subsidiary of DHS, as is CBP.
The FF criterion for precheck is based on the assumption that if you travel a lot you aren't a bad guy. Absent meeting that assumption, the qualification proposed is background check and fingerprinting. I have GE and that was my drill.
Your assertion that TSA is less intrusive made me laugh.