Originally Posted by
slawecki
is it common for the airline to build and pay for the terminal? if ua builds it, and then goes belly up, can ua rent it to the highest bidder, and run it as they see fit? what control does mwaa have if it falls into disrepair? what if the owner ** decides to make a few more bucks by putting a whore house on the second level? puts in gambling?
these kind of things are highly political.
Right now Seattle is going through a massive airline shift of gates. Then the N terminal will go to only Alaska where they plan on paying to remodel/refurbish it.