FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Direct flights -- Why? What about Mileage Credit?
Old Jul 2, 2013, 7:21 am
  #24  
jbcarioca
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Miami, Nice
Programs: Marriott Titanium, AA Concierge Key, Delta, United, Emorates, and others
Posts: 4,694
Originally Posted by NetBrowser07
Searching for award space on United.. I see a number of 'direct flights' with 'Time on ground - Change planes' listed. How is that not a 1-stopper?
The two aircraft carry the same flight number. "Direct" means "same flight number" and nothing else.

Originally Posted by jmastron
I think the point was that on WN at least direct means "same plane", so you can stay onboard and generally won't miss a connection (though that's not guaranteed) -- other airlines (like UA) use the same flight number even when you must exit and connect to a completely different plane, which IMHO is just dishonest...
Actually with WN 'direct' means no change of gauge, but only because WN operates only 737's, albeit of varying model age etc. Most of them are indeed the same aircraft but by no means all.

I understand the frustration people find with the terminology. I am not trying to defend the use either, but only point out that as was said upthread, the practice predates airplanes when it was used in railroads.

Thus, it seems a bit harsh to me to call that dishonest just because many people have forgotten what the words mean if they ever knew. It is sad that many airline employees and travel agents now don't know the difference themselves.

It would be easier if the two words could continue to be used in their original meanings. It seems useful to me to have the distinction, not least because of sector counts and direct vs segment mileage credit. For taht reason I rarely book direct flights when I can book connecting non-stops instead. Only if the direct is cheaper do I consider it.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jul 2, 2013 at 11:18 am Reason: merge
jbcarioca is offline