<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by makin'miles:
Doesn't the A318 have another advantage in that there are many common-use parts with the A319/320/321? Plus, aren't pilots certified to fly all of these types?
I may be way out in left field here, but doesn't the A318 seem like the obvious choice (except for the Ottawa/Bombardier connection)?</font>
The A318 program was plagued by engine problems. The PW6000 engine designed for the aircraft has been a failure and PW has gone back to the drawing board. As a result, there have many cancellations for the aircraft. As a result I am sure Airbus will likely push the plane very cheap..
Another plus is they will likely be CFM powered. AC's current fleet is CFM powered. Spare part commonality
Now for the negatives:
The plane has not entered service yet. Plan to enter service this summer.
Cockpit commonality with larger planes may mean pilot salary structure will likely favour exisitng aircraft.
New aircraft.... New agreement...
The B717-200 will be cheaper to operate than A318s due to the T tail and rear mounted engines on very short haul flights.