Originally Posted by
seawolf
My thinking is if you can argue 25 D 1 applies:
then 25 G will apply
Rule 90 D is involuntary refund.
Interesting...I see your point.
I wonder how a court would interpret this seemingly contradictory language, since Rule 90(D) does state that it does apply to Rule 25, but only to its "Acceptance of Children" part.
As a point of reference, I looked at
DL's tariff, and their Rule 90 explicitly applies to any of the Rule 25 reasons for refusing to transport. Same with
United, although they have decided to change all the rule numbers.