Originally Posted by
travelinmanS
Just imagine how great AA would be now if they got a $50 million a year CEO instead of a lowly $20 million a year guy. That is the logic of your pay argument correct?
Yes exactly. Remember, this is a payout, based on performance, not a salary. If the airline had gone down, he wouldn't get comparatively much beyond his base salary - only an incentive to stay while the airline wound down, as approved by the judge. Hostess CEO I think got $200K bonus to wind down Hostess in an orderly manner, instead of leaving.
So if someone had done a better job, say avoided the merger, wiped out all the debt, remained independent, and exited bankruptcy, then I would have expected a bigger comp package like you mentioned. That person probably would get a Jack Welch type package, as well as a page in corporate history.