that there is no particular issue in having (1) only two toilets (2) at the very back of the plan (3) for the entirety of Y (4) with only a single crampy aisle leading there (5) for a flight whose duration can exceed 5 hours. After being a regular on that route for almost 10 years, I will probably switch to LY as well after having to hold myself from using the toilet for 3 hours because there were 35 other people queueing and the crew struggling to combine this with drinks service. Absolutely disgraceful.
Originally Posted by
d'Yquem
Which norbert designed an aircraft seat that requires a permanent flow of air to keep the cushion from collapsing and making the seat as hard as sitting on the floor and incredibly uncomfortable?
Which norbert decided to use such seats on a route where (me included): (i) passengers have large posteriors that require good padding; and (ii) passengers are more likely to voice complaints about lack of said padding.
I've yet to travel on a flight on this route where at least 3 of the seats aren't working at any one time.
BA, I can only speculate as to why you've decided to give up on the TLV route and make it so awful (see postings passim), but this is one thing too far. It looks like I'm moving to LY for this route. The staff may be rude, the passengers even more disgusting than on BA, the food certainly no better than BA. But at least my toches won't be numb and my hips in pain after a flight.