Originally Posted by
sinoflyer
You cannot do that! PRASM already takes into account the changes in capacity.
change in PRASM times change in capacity should simply return change in revenue. so they are interesting to compare... however, i think you have to be consistent about the use of leap-year adjusted numbers -- i would want to use the leap-adjusted basis here as well. ~7% increase in PRASM on ~5% decrease in daily capacity suggests that daily revenue is up a bit despite flying less.
one could argue that weather events help unit revenue by packing a week's worth of passengers onto five days of flights..
hard to tell exactly what this report means -- lots of variables, and it can be spun either way. wall street seems to like it. i'm not reading too much into it yet. march will be interesting, too -- we're moving into a period of easy comps, as they report PRASM changes against the beginning of the post-3/3 period..