FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why longer security lines could be a reality
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 9:26 am
  #18  
goalie
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
In most airports I travel through, they DO NOT do this. The lines are allowed to back up with no use of the metal detectors. In some airports there is a directive that - regardless of backups - the metal detectors are not to be used (except for children/families and other specified exceptions).


THere is all the incentive in the world right now for them NOT to increase the practice. From the agency's perspective, making the lines grow will increase justification for more staff. From the Administration's perspective, longer lines will serve the political ends of forcing Congress and trying to change control of congress to all D in 2014. From the paranoia side, the powers that control agency risk avoidance will think that terry-wrists will see such a step as a vulnerability and "test" the system, therefore the guard should be raised not lowered.

I would assume that Pre-Check will be one of the first areas to close.
Bolding mine: God, I hope not!
goalie is offline