And yet you keep mentioning what he said and how he has an interest in lying. You also dont explain why his behaviour was irrational. You also simply assert that it's
mproper, but again, without any reason. All you do say is that he should sit down and shut up and that businesses can do whatever they want when and how they want, icluding irrational acts. Putting aside the irony of that argument and going back to your claim you're only looking at his actions, you still have a problem when trying to dismiss as irrelevant the independent reports of his actions.