Originally Posted by
gengar
rofl, what do you mean, "No."? You keep changing your argument. First you argued that played tips are some type of cost that shouldn't get taxed. That's bad logic, as I already pointed out. Then you argued that a gambler gets taxed twice when tipping. That's just completely wrong, as I noted in my last post. Now you are just down to arguing that when there is an additional transaction (i.e., you tipping and contributing to a dealer's income), it's wrong for the gov to tax that income. Um, OK. The government taxing a source of income once? We can't get more anecdotal than that. That's not what people complain about when they complain about double taxation.
Glad I am keeping you amused.
First you argued that played tips are some type of cost that shouldn't get taxed.
- I am still arguing that point.
Now you are just down to arguing that when there is an additional transaction (i.e., you tipping and contributing to a dealer's income), it's wrong for the gov to tax that income.
yeah, that is a further example of how that same money gets taxed again.
I'm cool with the government taxing that income. Just not me also. Pick one, don't tax the same money twice.
The labeling of the same 5K as winnings and as income mean the effective tax that is received by the IRS is double what they should receive from 5K.