Originally Posted by
GUWonder
Plenty of police around the world are willing to give visiting tourists or other non-settled foreigners more of a break on minor infractions than they are willing to give to local residents. There may be good reasons for such discrimination, even if the discrimination doesn't always immediately serve my petty self-interest or stroke my shallow provincial/nationalist ego.
In Aspen, it is common for me to see some cars that have been parked in violation of the meter payment rules; and yet most such times the authorities there issue warnings to the violating tourists as part of a practice to make the place feel welcoming to tourists and accepting that educating the visiting public doesn't require hitting tourists with a fine and potentially turning them off from returning to the tourist destination or telling others to visit the tourist destination. Sure, the LEOs can hit them with a fine as much or more; but it's not necessarily worth it, especially when behavior and revenue may be better enhanced with education than petty punitive action.
Since the OP complained that he was fined, in spite of there being no notices about the compulsory wearing of seat belts, perhaps it is possible that the policeman who fined him for not wearing a seat belt did so because the OP was not carrying a sign stating he was a tourist?
It's pretty obvious that there was a road safety campaign that week that concentrated on seat belts. In another week, it might have been on speeding, car warrants of fitness etc, etc