FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - EL AL reconstitution plan
View Single Post
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 6:08 am
  #24  
Bernie2012
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Travelling EMEA
Programs: LH SEN*2
Posts: 798
Originally Posted by ELY001
I have nothing against the 777 per se. The reason why I would get rid of both the 767's and 777's has to do primarily with fleet rationalization.

I want to rationalize the fleet around 3 a/c types only; the A380, A330, and 737. We all know that LY needs to replace the 767's soon. I believe that the A330 is a perfect replacement for both the 767 and 777 as its size is between the two and any route that the 767 and 777 fly, the A330 could fly more economically. Back during the late 1990's former EL AL CEO Joel Feldschuh actually picked the A330 over the 777 after an extensive study was done showing that this type would be more economical for LY than the 777. He essentially got fired for that decision and the government forced LY to go with the 777, which was a mistake from a purely economical standpoint.

There is also another issue involved. If I go to Airbus and tell them, hey I want to rationalize my entire long haul fleet with your models, they would be much more eager to do whatever needed to be done to get the deal as oppose to me going to them and saying I want a few A380s only.
Hi ELY001, maybe you take another aircraft into your considerations, the A350-900R, coming soon with a maximum range of 19.100 km. I think that should be popular for point to point LHR SYD for example.

Nevertheless, I usually prefer to have a stop on such a long flight, just to move around a bid and to have a smoke.
Bernie2012 is offline